Here is an illustration, based on Don Berwick's "Level of Interest," that often helps me identify players, understand where they're seated, and anticipate where (and why) to expect push-back.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22565/22565c16d25aacfcab4add93d6837cc4e526bb28" alt=""
Berwick wrote the piece this slide is drawn from as a "user's guide" for people who would be leading improvement efforts in the aftermath of the IOM report "Crossing the Quality Chasm."
It's worth considering where the elements (drivers; incentives; methodologies) described and critiqued in the Intermountain system fit into Berwick's original construct. (This a case where the expression "same stuff, different decade" is not a slam, but rather a chance to see the evolution of welcome change.)
A better case for a system-approach to healthcare improvement cannot be made than what you'll find in the New York Times piece.
Read it. More importantly, learn from it.
No comments:
Post a Comment